Legal Opinion
Access Care, Inc. v. Sten-Barr Network Solutions, Inc.
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 30, 2005No. 19-11510PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STEPHEN RASLAVICH, Bankruptcy Judge.
Defendant, Sten-Barr Network Solutions, Inc. (“Sten-Barr”), moves pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(3), to have the complaint of plaintiff/debtor, Access Care, Inc. (“Debtor”), dismissed based upon the forum selection clause (“Forum Selection Clause”) contained in the parties’ contracts. 1 In the alternative, Sten-Barr seeks to have the adversary proceeding transferred to Bre-vard County, Florida.
Upon consideration, Sten-Barr’s request for dismissal shall be denied. Its request for transfer shall be granted albeit not to its requested…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Coastal Steel Corp. v. Tilghman Wheelabrator Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Hays and Company, as Trustee for Monge Oil Corporation v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Lauro Lines S.R.L. v. ChasserSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Central Contracting Co. v. C. E. Youngdahl & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Sw Bach & Co.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Togut v. RBC Dain Correspondent Services (In re Bach)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Bavaria Yachts USA, LLLP v. Bavaria Yachtbau GmbH (In re Bavaria Yachts USA, LLLP)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2017
- Omaha Creek Trailer Sales, Inc. and Beau Barclay v. Lane Andrew Patmon; Lane Andrew Patmon v. Sandhills Global, Inc. d/b/a AuctionTIME.COM, Omaha Creek Trailer Sales, Inc., and Beau BarclayUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2026