Aurora v. Zoning Board of Appeals
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtShea, J.
The plaintiffs appealed to the Court of Common Pleas from the action of the defendant in granting the application of Stop and Shop, Inc., of Connecticut for a variance of the East Haven zoning ordinance regulating the distance between retail outlets selling alcoholic beverages. The defendant filed a plea in abatement stating that “the Court has no jurisdiction . . . because the appeal was not served within fifteen . . . days from the date when . . . [the] decision ... [of the defendant] . . . was rendered” as required by § 8-8 of the General Statutes. To this plea the plaintiffs filed a…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Cardoza v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Huhta v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
- Aurora v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Leonard v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
- Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. HolleyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.