360 Construction Co. v. Atsalis Brothers Painting Co.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
DAVID M. LAWSON, District Judge.
Painting the Mackinac Bridge is an enormous, labor-intensive task, but it must be done with regularity. The Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) outsources that project by means of a *886sealed bid method. The plaintiff in this case, 360 Construction Company, was the successful low bidder on a request for proposal that was returned in June 2010 to clean and paint an eight-tenths-mile span of the Bridge. Defendant Atsalis Brothers had submitted the next lowest bid,…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Crystal Babbin v. Laura MuirheadDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2026
- LinTech Global, Inc. v. Can Softtech, Inc. and Swapna ReddygariDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2026
- Richardson v. Home Depot Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2024
- Roy Allan Slurry Seal, Inc. v. Amer. Asphalt So., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2015
- Square Lake Hills Association v. Russell GarlandMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020