Legal Opinion

Core Funding Group, LLC v. Young

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided July 22, 2003No. 49A05-0208-CV-364PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MAY, Judge

Core Funding Group, LLC, (“Core”) appeals a $250,000 class action default judg ment against it and in favor of James Young. Core asserts on appeal the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) does not permit class actions and the trial court should not have certified Young’s class. We find Core’s arguments regarding the class certification and the propriety of a class action are unavailable on appeal 1 because the default judgment amounts to a confession of Young’s complaint, which complaint included allegations sufficient to establish the appropriateness of the class…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Califano v. YamasakiSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Sidney Davis, III v. Charles T. HutchinsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  4. Aetna Securities Co. v. SickelsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1949
  5. Davis v. DavisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. MLC Mortgage Corp. v. Sun America Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
  2. Loc. Baking Prod. v. Kosher Bagel.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2011
  3. JK HARRIS & CO., LLC v. SandlinIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Ballard RN Center, Inc. v. Kohll's Pharmacy & Homecare, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2015
  5. MLC MORTGAGE CORPPORATION v. Sun America Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API