Bowell v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SINGLETON, Judge.
Russell S. Bowell was convicted by a jury of kidnapping in violation of AS 11.41.-300(a)(1), and first-degree sexual assault in violation of AS 11.41.410(a)(1). Bowell appeals, challenging his conviction. We affirm Bowell’s conviction, but remand to permit the trial court to consider Bowell’s motion for a new trial.
FACTS
James D. Thomas, Bowell’s codefendant, sexually assaulted B.S. in the back of a vehicle driven by Bowell. B.S. testified that she had been walking when she observed two men she later learned to be Bowell and Thomas in a Toyota driving slowly by her.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cupp v. NaughtenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- McClain v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Dorman v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Hensel v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Reynolds v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- American Dog Owners Ass'n v. Dade County, Fla.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1989
- Echols v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1991
- Knutson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1987
- S.R.D. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1991
- Willis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2002
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.