Echols v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COATS, Judge.
Arthur W. Echols was convicted, following a jury trial, of assault in the first degree, a class A felony. AS 11.41.200. Echols appeals, arguing that Superior Court Judge Mark C. Rowland did not properly charge the jury on the elements of her offense. We agree and reverse Echols’ conviction.
Arthur Echols was indicted based on an incident which occurred when her husband, Melvin J. Echols, beat the Echols’ fourteen-year-old daughter, T.E., with an extension cord. The grand jury charged Melvin Echols with assault in the first degree based upon this incident, along with seven…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. PeoniCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
- Tarnef v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
- Hensel v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Thomas v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1964
- Mahle v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. BlankenshipSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
- State v. BridgesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
- Hansen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1993
- Ashenfelter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1999
- Erickson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.