Legal Opinion

Lucas v. Titus County Hospital District

Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)

Decided March 13, 1998No. 06-96-00069-CVPublished

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

The Hospital continues to urge on rehearing that a supplementation of the discovery was not required in this case. The Hospital contends that the rule of supplementation does not apply to fact witnesses and places too great a burden on the parties. We disagree. The rule does not provide an exception for fact witnesses. In a case where the failure to supplement goes to a salient issue in a ease, as it does in the present ease, the rule requires supplementation. In the present case, Standridge testified in her deposition that she told the Lucases’ expert that the chair…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Westfall Family Farms, Inc. v. King Ranch, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1993
  2. Ramirez v. Otis Elevator Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
  3. Ricardo N., Inc. v. Turcios De ArguetaTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Ricardo N., Inc. v. Turcios De Argueta, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API