Legal Opinion
Amato v. Hearst Corp.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 29, 2014No. AC35803PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
The plaintiff, Anne M. Amato, appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the defendant, The Hearst Corporation, following the granting of the defendant’s motion to strike her complaint. The complaint alleged that the defendant discriminated against the plaintiff on the basis of age, in violation of General Statutes § 46a-60 of the Connecticut Fair Employment Practices Act (act), General Statutes § 46a-51 et seq. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly (1) concluded that it was bound by federal precedent in interpreting the provisions of the act,…
3Cases cited17 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- George K. SCARIA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert E. RUBIN, Secretary of the Treasury, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Levy v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Brittell v. Department of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- Heyward v. Judicial Dep't of Conn.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- Boucher v. Saint Francis GI Endoscopy, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
- Chima v. KX Tech LLCDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2022