Legal Opinion
Purificati v. Meyer & Diesenhouse
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 27, 1997PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for legal malpractice, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Goldstein, J.), entered July 23, 1996, as, upon an order of the same court dated May 17, 1996, granting the motion of the defendants third-party plaintiffs for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross-claims against them, dismissed the complaint.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
For the defendants in a legal malpractice case to succeed on a motion for summary judgment, they…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Greene v. Payne, Wood & LittlejohnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Platt v. PortnoyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Andrews Beverage Distributor, Inc. v. SternAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- L.I.C. Commercial Corp. v. RosenthalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lefkowitz v. LurieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Tibodeau v. AbrahamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Attonito v. La Mirage of Southampton, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Collard & Roe, P.C. v. VlacancichAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2004
- D'Antonio v. SamuelsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999