Bobby Jack Howard v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1DissentRives, Circuit Judge
The sufficiency of the evidence to require submission to the jury of the issue of insanity was primarily for the trial judge. Both he and the jury had the advantage of seeing and observing the defendant, which this Court lacks. As bearing on the issue of insanity, the trial judge and the jury could take into consideration not only the evidence spe*605cifically directed to that issue, but also the defendant’s appearance and demean- or, and indeed all of the evidence in the case. They had a right to consider that the circumstances of the robbery disclosed an utter lack of sense and no effort…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Leland v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Durham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
- United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.