Legal Opinion

Bacher v. Hebel

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County

Decided February 20, 1942No. 3103Published

1Opinion of the Court

Levinthal, J.,

— Defendant’s statutory demurrer challenges the legal sufficiency of plaintiff’s statement of claim.

Plaintiff alleges the following: That she became ad-ministratrix of the estate of Anna Hofman, deceased, on January 29, 1940; that she employed as counsel William J. Bailen, “and as such, he came into the possession of all the papers of decedent”; that among decedent’s papers were two notes made by defendant to decedent, namely, a judgment note for $2,000 and a promissory note for $1,000; that when Bailen presented these notes to defendant for payment the latter informed him that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Township of North Whitehall v. KellerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1882
  2. Brockley v. BrockleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
  3. Pepper v. Cairns, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1890
  4. Inc. Town of Wainwright v. Eureka Fire Hose Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Isaacs v. ZugsmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1883

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API