Legal Opinion

Fred C. Church & Co. v. Pacy

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided April 29, 1970No. 7269; No. 1728PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal is from a ruling of an interlocutory matter (a motion to dismiss) in a case not ripe for judgment.

The report does not clearly appear to be the report of the trial judge. Patrick v. Mikolaitis, 22 Mass. App. Dec. 167; Pokrant v. Horrigan, 20 Mass. App. Dec. 1; Krock v. Consolidated Mines and Power Co., 286 Mass. 177.

The motion to dismiss should be treated as a demurrer. Carmel Credit Union v. Lesser, 344 Mass. 623.

As a demurrer, its grounds would be that the matters contained in the declaration are insufficient in law to enable the plaintiff to maintain its action. GLL. c. 231, §…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Krock v. Consolidated Mines & Power Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  2. Patrick v. MikolaitisMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1961
  3. Pokrant v. HorriganMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1960
  4. Carmel Credit Union v. LesserMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nonantum Lumber Co. v. DepamphilisMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1981
  2. Cohn v. CavalleranoMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1980
  3. Dufresne-Henry v. John R. Murphy Engineering Corp.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API