Legal Opinion

Hirsch v. Jones Intercable, Inc.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 28, 1999No. 99SA30PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kourlis

Petitioner Jones Intercable, Inc. (Jones), the Defendant below, is the general partner of three limited partnerships. Jones seeks relief from the district court’s ruling refusing to dismiss a derivative action brought by the limited partners of those partnerships, who are the Respondents in this action and the Plaintiffs below, despite the fact that the limited partners did not make a demand upon Jones prior to filing suit. Jones also seeks relief from the district court’s decision not to dismiss Respondents’ action on the basis of the report of an Independent Counsel whom the court appointed…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
  3. Auerbach v. BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Zapata Corp. v. MaldonadoSupreme Court of Delaware · 1981
  5. Barr v. WackmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1975

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Fujimoto v. AuHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
  2. In Re UnitedHealth Group Inc. Shareholder Derivative LitigationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  3. Boland v. BolandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  4. Hi-Country Property Rights Group v. EmmerUtah Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Caparos v. MortonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API