Legal Opinion
United States v. David Jemal
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided July 25, 1994No. 93-5172PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
BECKER, Circuit Judge.
This appeal from a judgment in a criminal case presents an important question under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b): whether a defendant may, by offering a comprehensive and unreserved stipulation that he possessed the knowledge, intent, motive, opportunity, or other fact sought to be established by Rule 404(b) evidence, prevent the government from putting on evidence of the defendant’s prior bad acts. This question arises in a mail fraud case stemming from a “bust-out” scheme allegedly masterminded by defendant David Jemal. Along with co-conspirator…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Michelson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. Jose Figueroa, Angel Lebron, and Ralph AcostaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Francis P. Long, A/K/A "Red", John Hackett, A/K/A "Jack"Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Anthony Provenzano, Stephen Andretta, and Thomas AndrettaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- United States v. Yul Darnell Givan, United States of America v. Wayne TorrenceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- United States v. GreenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- United States v. KempCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Richard C. HimelwrightCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Crowder, Rochelle A.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.