Legal Opinion

American Import Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 29, 1969No. C.D. 3807PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Newman, Judge:

The issue presented in these two consolidated protests is the proper tariff classification of certain wooden gunracks imported from Japan. In each of these cases, the gunracks were assessed with duty by the customs officials at the same rate, 16% per centum ad valorem, but under different provisions of the Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS). The gunracks in protest 65/9512 were classified as articles not specially provided for, of wood, under item 207.00, TSUS, and those in protest 66/10924 were classified as household utensils not specially provided for, of wood,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fabry Associates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  2. Carlowitz v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  3. Furniture Import Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  4. Hurricane Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  5. Hurricane Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sprouse Reitz & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  2. Albert E. Price, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
  3. Amthor Imports, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API