Legal Opinion

Enyong, Ex Parte Kufreabasi Ita

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 24, 2013No. PD-0649-12PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Pursuant to a plea agreement, the Appellant pled guilty in 2010 to assault and violation of a protective order. He subsequently filed an application' for a writ of habeas corpus claiming that his counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to advise him of the immigration consequences of his guilty pleas. The trial court denied relief and the Court of Appeals reversed. Enyong v. State, 369 S.W.3d 593 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2012). 1 The State has filed a petition for discretionary review contending the Court of Appeals erred in holding that Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S.…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. Chaidez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. De Los Reyes, Ex Parte JoelCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013
  5. Ex Parte Enyong, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2012

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Stanley Anozie Obi, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2014
  2. State v. NkiamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
  3. In re BorundaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  4. Ex Parte Raymundo Salazar v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2023
  5. Ex Parte: Wisdom Ukachukwu Amanze v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API