United States v. Sanders
U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
FREYER, Judge:
After the military judge had approved the appellant’s request for trial by military judge alone and assembled the court, the appellant was arraigned on one charge with three specifications of absence without leave from Fleet Training Center, Naval Station, Norfolk, Virginia. He pled guilty to Specifications 1 and 3, and not guilty to Specification 2. The providence inquiry relative to Specifications 1 and 3 was conducted satisfactorily, although not without difficulty. The Government introduced documentary evidence tending to establish the appellant’s guilt of Specification 2…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. Charles P. BourassaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
- United States v. CarlisleUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
- United States v. BacaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
- United States v. ClemonsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. CookUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. JonesU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1992
- United States v. RoxasNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1994