Legal Opinion

State v. Scott

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 27, 1970No. 7021SC172PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBritt, J.

Defendant first assigns as error the court’s refusal to allow court-appointed counsel to withdraw from the case. When the case was called for trial, Attorney Tyndall stated to the court, “Prior to pleading to the bill of indictment, I think the defendant has some comments he would like to make to the court.” The jury was excused from the courtroom and an extended inquiry by the court followed. Defendant stated that he wanted another attorney, that he was not satisfied with Mr. Tyndall, that “I don’t think he’s working right on my case.” The inquiry revealed that sixteen cases were pending…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. William Brown, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
  2. State v. McNeilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. State v. ElliottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. People v. TerryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. State v. MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. SimmsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  2. State v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  3. State v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API