Legal Opinion
Hobbs v. Stroh Brewery Co.
District Court, S.D. Mississippi
Decided December 28, 2001No. CIV.A. 399CV715WSPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
WINGATE, District Judge.
This case is before the court on a Motion for Summary Judgment filed by defendant, The Stroh Brewery Company (“Stroh”) pursuant to Rule 56(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 1 Stroh also has filed a Motion to Strike certain affidavits submitted in response to the Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff opposes both motions. Nevertheless, after having studied the pleadings and having heard the arguments of counsel for both parties, this court is persuaded to grant both motions.
Findings of Fact
Ernest D. Hobbs, II (“Hobbs”), plaintiff herein,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Kennett-Murray Corporation v. John E. BoneCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. StevensDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2008