Legal Opinion

Town of Leesville v. Kapotsky

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 25, 1929No. 29802PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRogers, J.

Relator applies for a mandamus to compel the district judge to allow him a suspensive appeal from a judgment ordering prohibitory and mandatory injunctions to issue, restraining him from obstructing a certain drainage ditch, and commanding him to forthwith remove the obstructions.

Plaintiff, the town of Leesville, alleges that the defendant, Albert Kapotsky, had closed a natural drain which extended across his property, thereby obstructing the natural flow of the water and creating a cesspool opposite his property, to the injury of the health and life of the inhabitants of the municipality.

Plai…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Broussard v. CormierSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Red River v. NolesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
  2. Seaboard Air Line Railroad v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. Baton Rouge Bldg. Trades Council v. T. L. James & Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
  4. City of New Orleans v. LangensteinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. Adams v. FieldingSupreme Court of Florida · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API