Town of Leesville v. Kapotsky
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the CourtRogers, J.
Relator applies for a mandamus to compel the district judge to allow him a suspensive appeal from a judgment ordering prohibitory and mandatory injunctions to issue, restraining him from obstructing a certain drainage ditch, and commanding him to forthwith remove the obstructions.
Plaintiff, the town of Leesville, alleges that the defendant, Albert Kapotsky, had closed a natural drain which extended across his property, thereby obstructing the natural flow of the water and creating a cesspool opposite his property, to the injury of the health and life of the inhabitants of the municipality.
Plai…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Broussard v. CormierSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
3Cited by6 opinions
- Red River v. NolesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
- Seaboard Air Line Railroad v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Baton Rouge Bldg. Trades Council v. T. L. James & Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
- City of New Orleans v. LangensteinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1956
- Adams v. FieldingSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.