Legal Opinion
In Re: Queen's University at Kingston
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided March 7, 2016No. 2015-145PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge O’MALLEY. Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge REYNA.
O’MALLEY, Circuit Judge.
Petitioners Queen’s University at Kingston and PARTEQ (together, “Queen’s University”) are engaged in a patent infringement action against Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and.Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (together, “Samsung”) in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. They seek a writ of mandamus directing the district court to withdraw its order compelling the production of Queen’s University’s communications with its non-attorney…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Mallard v. United States Dist. Court for Southern Dist. of IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Allied Chemical Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- In Re: Cray Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- In Re: Zte (Usa) Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- In Re: Micron Technology, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- In Re: Bigcommerce, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- In re SilverTexas Supreme Court · 2018
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.