Legal Opinion

Olson v. Smith

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 12, 1912No. Nos. 17,325—(178)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Action in the district court for Beltrami county to recover $1,264.-50. From an order, Stanton, J., overruling defendant’s demurrer to the complaint, he appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtPhilip E. Brown, J.

Appeal from an order overruling a general demurrer to the plaintiffs’ complaint.

The action is one for the recovery of damages for the defendant’s failure to perform certain promises alleged to have been falsely and fraudulently made by the defendant as an inducement for the plaintiffs to remove and relocate their sawmill.

The complaint alleges that the plaintiffs were owners of a sawmill in Langor, Beltrami county, and that the defendant owned property in Puposky, in said county, and was interested in building up the village; that in December, 1907, the defendant represented to the plaintiffs…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Albitz v. Minneapolis & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  2. McElrath v. Electric Investments Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1911

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. General Corporation v. General Motors CorporationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1960
  2. McIntyre v. DawesMontana Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Holmes v. WilkesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  4. Smith v. VosikaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API