Legal Opinion
State v. Clement
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided January 10, 1938No. 34628PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ODOM, Justice.
Herman Clement, Emile Panvelle, Eddie Panvelle, and Junius Landry were convicted of violating the provisions of Act No. 130 of 1936. Separate bills of information were filed against them, and their cases are consolidated in this court.
The specific charge made against Herman Clement is that:
“[He] did wilfully and unlawfully go upon swamp lands, not in cultivation, in Township 13, South range IS East, situated in the Parish of St. James, owned by Burton and Schwartz Cypress Co. and set traps thereon, without the consent of said owner, or Francis Waguespack the lessee of said…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State ex rel. Cothren v. LeanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1859
- People ex rel. Miller v. CooperIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
- People Ex Rel. Lee v. Board of SupervisorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
- State v. NejinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
- State Ex Rel. Porterie v. SmithSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- TEACHERS'RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF LOUISIANA v. VialSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
- Kimball v. Allstate Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1998
- Knapp v. Jefferson-Plaquemines Drainage Dist.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1953
- City of Natchitoches v. StateLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1969
- Kotch v. Board of River Port Pilot Com'rsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1946
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.