Florida House of Representatives Ex Rel. Kriseman v. Expedia, Inc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtPadovano, J.
The issue before the court is whether a member of the Florida House of Representatives and his aide are entitled to claim legislative privilege as a ground for refusing to testify in a civil case. A legislative privilege existed under the common law, and we conclude that it continues to apply in Florida by general legislation adopting the common law. We also conclude that a legislative privilege is implicit in the separation of powers provision of the Florida Constitution. Because the testimony to be given in this case is within the scope of the privilege, we hold that the subpoenas at issue…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Mireles v. WacoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Forrester v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- League of Women Voters v. Florida House of RepresentativesSupreme Court of Florida · 2013
- Florida v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 2012
- Florida House of Representatives v. RomoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Essenson v. Bloom (In re Bloom)District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- Florida House of Representatives v. RomoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.