Legal Opinion

Sacks v. Jordan

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 20, 2004No. A03A1306; A03A1307PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Miller, Judge.

Bobby Todd Jordan applied to have his property line with adjoining landowners processioned. Although the resulting processioners’ return and surveyor’s plat filed with the probate court determined a property line adverse to Jordan’s interests, he did not file a protest. Five years later, Jordan filed an independent action in superior court to determine title and boundaries. After a bench trial, the trial court found that the property line determined by the processioners was inaccurate and concluded that the accurate property line resulted in more acreage to Jordan. In Case No.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Tucker v. RobertsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  2. Georgia Talc Co. v. Cohutta Talc Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  3. Wisenbaker v. WarrenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  4. Howland v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  5. Overstreet v. DixonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hall v. CHRISTIAN CHURCH OF GEORGIA, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API