Legal Opinion
Perry v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided April 6, 1993No. 92-668CPublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
NETTESHEIM, Judge.
This case is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to RCFG 12(b)(1). Argument is deemed unnecessary.
FACTS
The following facts drawn from plaintiff’s amended complaint are undisputed, except where noted. In 1989 Diana Perry (“plaintiff”) was indicted for alleged violations of federal gambling laws. Much of the evidence implicating plaintiff was obtained by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (the “FBI”), in Omaha, Nebraska, through the use of wiretaps that were authorized by a state district court judge. On…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. United States Coin & CurrencySupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Florida Rock Industries, Inc., Appellee/cross-Appellant v. The United States, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Arnett v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Bowman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
- Crocker v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
- Commonwealth Edison Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- Pettro v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- Beres v. StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.