Legal Opinion

People v. Cole

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1884PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Oakland. (Stickney, J.) Larceny. Respondent brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.

Respondent was convicted of larceny of property exceeding twenty-five dollars in value, The offense *239was committed in Oakland county and within two miles of the city of Pontiac. The circuit judge excluded evidence of the value of the property in the city of Detroit, and confined the proof to the value at the time and place when and where the larceny was committed.

There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

The other Justices concurred

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. ShedoudyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Burrows v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  3. People v. JohnsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. People v. CianiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. People v. DyerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API