People v. Paul
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Saxe, J.P.
In Crawford v Washington (541 US 36 [2004]), the United States Supreme Court ruled that the admission of “testimonial” statements by an unavailable witness violates the Confrontation Clause of the United States Constitution unless the defendant had the opportunity to cross-examine the person who made the statement. Since then, disagreements have arisen about which types of out-of-court statements do and do not violate the Confrontation Clause. In this appeal of a murder conviction, defendant argues that the testimony of civilian eyewitnesses as to a dying…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- People v. NievesNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. MAHER (KENNETH)New York Court of Appeals · 1997
- People v. LiccioneNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. MillerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- People v. LebrechtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2006
- People v. McEaddyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- People v. BryantAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- People v. ValdesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.