Legal Opinion

Hard v. The Advance

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 11, 1894PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In Admiralty. Libel by Anson W. Hard and others against the proceeds of the sale of the steamship Advance, for certain disbursements, and commissions.

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, District Judge.

The above libel was filed by the libel-ants, bankers in New York, to enforce an alleged maritime lien for moneys advanced at Victoria, Brazil, by a branch house of the libel-ants’ firm, for the purpose of disbursing the steamship Advance upon her last departure from that port before the failure of the United States & Brazil Mail Steamship Company, her owners, in February, 1893.

The libelants’ branch house had been acting as the agents of the company’s steamers at Victoria for about a year previous, under a power of attorney executed’to them by the steamship company, dated…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Carmona v. The Esteban de AntunanoU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Louisiana · 1887
  2. Mudgett v. The RaleighDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1887
  3. China Mut. Ins. v. WardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1894
  4. Ward v. The RaleighU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1888

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Brown v. The AlliancaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API