Legal Opinion
Brown v. The Allianca
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 16, 1894PublishedCited by 10 opinions
In Admiralty.
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, District Judge.
The steamships Advance, Allianca, Segurancia, and Vigilancia were owned by the United States & Brazil Mail Steamship Company, and were ran by that company between Yew York and ports in Brazil until the failure of the company in February, 1893. On March 18,1892), the petitioner, Henry Winthrop Gray, was appointed by the supreme court of this state receiver of the company.
All the above claims are based upon the same transactions as were presented by the same parties in the actions against the freights of the Kate and four other chartered steamers, tried at the same time…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- The KaluramaSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Thomas v. OsbornSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
- The PatapscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Gray v. Freights of the KateDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1894
- McCaldin v. The StromaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1892
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Gray v. Freights of the KateDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1894
- Huntington v. Proceeds of the AdvanceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1896
- The UnderwriterDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1902
- London Assur. Co. v. Proceeds of the AlliancaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1895
- Ambassador Factors, Division Fleet Factors Corp. v. First American Bulk Carrier Corp. (In re Topgallant Lines, Inc.)District Court, D. Georgia · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.