Senteney v. Sabatka-Rine

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA LARRY SENTENEY, Petitioner, 8:22CV89 vs. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DIANE SABATKA-RINE, Respondent. This matter is before the Court on Respondent’s motion for summary judgment (the “MSJ”). Filing No. 15. In support, Respondent submits that Petitioner’s habeas claims are procedurally defaulted because he did not properly exhaust all available state court remedies and can no longer fairly present his claims to the state courts. Filing No. 17 at 3. Petitioner has not responded to the MSJ and the time to do so has passed. As such, this…