Legal Opinion

Bornemann v. Connecticut Siting Council

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 3, 2008No. SC 17984PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

The defendant Nextel Communications, Inc. (Nextel), obtained from the named defendant, the Connecticut Siting Council (council), the approval necessary to construct a cellular tower on certain real property owned by the Carl and Barbara Bomemann Family Trust without a certificate of environmental compatibility and public need as required by General Statutes § 16-501C. Thereafter, the named plaintiff, Carl Bomemann, filed a petition for a declaratory ruling with the council, requesting that the council void Nextel’s approval, and seeking other relief. The plaintiff EMR Policy Institute,…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Blesso Fire Systems, Inc. v. Eastern Connecticut State UniversitySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  2. Sullivan v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Martinelli v. FusiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  2. M&T Bank v. LewisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2024
  3. State v. Jerzy G.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API