Legal Opinion

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Miller

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 30, 1928No. 8 Div. 12PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, J,

It is the settled law in this jurisdiction that, to authorize the recovery of exemplary damages in an action for wrongful attachment, the complainant must not only show that the process was wrongfully sued out, but that the plaintiff sued out the writ, without probable cause for believing that some statutory ground therefor existed, and that there was a debt or demand justly due or owing by the defendant to the plaintiff. Schloss et al. v. Rovelsky, 107 Ala. 596, 18 So. 71; Crofford v. Vassar, 95 Ala. 548,10 So. 350; Hamilton v. Maxwell, 119 Ala. 23, 24 So. 769; Bell et al. v. Seals…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Pollock & Co. v. GanttSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  2. City National Bank v. JeffriesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  3. Spaids v. BarrettIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
  4. Vandiver & Co. v. WallerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
  5. Dothard v. SheidSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Albertson v. RaboffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Delchamps, Inc. v. BryantSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  3. McMillian v. JohnsonDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1995
  4. Exford v. City of MontgomeryDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2012
  5. Tarver v. Household Finance CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API