Legal Opinion

Erdoisa v. South Side Bruneau Canal Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1942No. 6977Published

1Opinion of the CourtGivens, C. J.

While other incidents appear in the record, the essential details of this litigation are as follows:

March 23, 1896, by posting, and April 2, 1896, by recording notice, Dow Dunning, Josiah W. Dunning, and Justin Kandle claimed and made an appropriation of 1200 inches of water of the Bruneau River for use on land on the west side thereof. Further notice of location of evidently the same amount was made by the same parties with the addition of George Dunning, April 30, filed May 4, 1896. Thereafter, Dow Dunning granted John Mitchell, November 15, 1899, 200 inches of said appropriation; George…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Morris v. American Public Utilities CompanyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1923
  2. Garey v. St. Joe Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Miller v. Imperial Water Co. No. 8California Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Sanderson v. Salmon River Canal Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Pronick v. Spirits Distributing Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1899

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API