Legal Opinion
Navarro v. Procter & Gamble Company
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided November 20, 2020No. 1:17-cv-00406Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION ANNETTE NAVARRO, et al., Plaintiffs, Case No. 1:17-cv-406 v. JUDGE DOUGLAS R. COLE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY, et al., Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER This matter comes before the Court on two of Defendants’ Motions in Limine to exclude Navarro’s experts on profit-based damages (Docs. 215 and 216). One of the two motions addresses Professor Larry Chiagouris. Chiagouris is a marketing professor who opines essentially that (1) images are an important aspect of consumer goods packaging; and (2) Navarro’s images had a positive…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- In Re Scrap Metal Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Amstar Corporation v. Domino's Pizza, Inc. And Atlanta Pizza, Inc., Pizza Enterprises, Inc. And Pizza Services, Inc., Hanna Creative Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.