State v. Ireland
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DURRANT, Justice:
INTRODUCTION
¶ 1 For a Utah court to have jurisdiction over a defendant, the charged offense must have been committed, at least partly, within the state. 1 In this case, Jeffrey Don Ireland was charged with unlawful possession or use of a controlled substance 2 based exclusively on the fact that he tested positive for the existence of methamphetamines in his bloodstream. We are asked to determine whether the existence of methamphetamines in Ireland’s bloodstream conclusively showed that Ireland possessed or used a controlled substance within the state.
¶ 2 Utah Code section…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Robinson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- State v. BrakeUtah Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. HornadayWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. FlinchpaughSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
- State v. MaestasUtah Supreme Court · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Peck v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2008
- MacHock v. FinkUtah Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. CarrenoUtah Supreme Court · 2006
- John Kuhni & Sons Inc. v. Labor Comm'nCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018
- C.P.B. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.