Information Sciences Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND FINAL ORDER REGARDING ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPENSES.
BRADEN, Judge.
To facilitate review of this Memorandum Opinion and Final Order, the court has provided the following outline:
275 I. THE COURT’S PRIOR DECISIONS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY.
II. DISCUSSION. 276
A. Jurisdiction. 276
B. Standing.. 277
C. The Equal Access To Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412. 277
D. Standard Of Review. 278
E. Plaintiffs And Plaintiff-Intervenor’s Motions For Attorney Fees And Expenses Under The Equal Access For Justice Act. 278
1. Plaintiff And Plaintiff-Intervenor Are “Eligible Parties.” 278
a. Plaintiffs And…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Information Sciences Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- United Partition Systems, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Waltner v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Martinez v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.