Amer. Radiator Co. v. Modern Utilities Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Parker, J.,
On appeal to this court, the parties in interest, pursuant to Rule 56, prepared and signed a statement of the case showing how the questions arose and were decided in the court below and setting forth the facts. As there were no disputed facts, the sole question in the entire controversy was one of law. A statement of the facts is sufficient in itself to demonstrate that the appellant must prevail.
The defendant, Modern Utilities Company, was indebted to Security Trust Company in the sum of $15,-950 at a date when receivers were appointed for such defendant by the common…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Brothers v. Girard National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
- Hibert v. LangSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
- Shipler v. New Castle Paper Products Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Fisher v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
3Cited by6 opinions
- Anthracite Trust Co. Mears's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Gray v. School Dist. of Borough of BrownsvilleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1933
- Harr v. Bankers Securities Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Toledo MacK Sales & Service, Inc. v. MacK Trucks, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- Franklin Trust Co. of Philadelphia CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.