Legal Opinion

Buzick v. Public Employees' Retirement Ass'n

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided September 24, 1992No. 91CA1403PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge RULAND.

Plaintiffs, Larry Buzick, M. Lee Maurer, and William S. Daley, appeal from a judgment dismissing their complaint against defendant, Public Employees’ Retirement Association of Colorado (PERA), for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We affirm.

Plaintiffs were employed as legislative analysts for the Joint Budget Committee (JBC) of the General Assembly. During their employment at the JBC, plaintiffs were enrolled in PERA and remained members for approximately nine years. According to plaintiffs, it was only after this time that they became aware of their exemption rights.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ross v. Fire and Police Pension Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  2. Colorado Springs Fire Fighters Ass'n, Local 5 v. City of Colorado SpringsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  3. Colorado State Board of Land Commissioners v. Colorado Mined Land Reclamation BoardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  4. GREYHOUND RACING ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHERN COLORADO, INC. v. Colorado Racing CommissionColorado Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Hurricane v. Public Employees' Retirement Ass'n of ColoradoColorado Court of Appeals · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Romer v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  2. Harris v. Regional Transportation DistrictColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Castle Rock Construction Co. v. Department of TransportationColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Romer v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API