Lisso v. Williams
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Appeal froin Eleventh Judicial District Court, Parish of Bed Biver; W. T. Cunningham, Judge. Actions by Sam Lisso and others against Mrs. Mary E. Williams and against S. P. Schenberger and others. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtPbovosty, J.
In a suit against a Mrs. M. E. Williams, Lisso & Bros., Limited, caused a writ of attachment to issue, and the one-third interest undivided of the said Mrs. M. E. Williams in 739 acres of land to be seized. The attachment was maintained, and the property seized was ordered to be sold to satisfy the debt. An ordinary writ of fieri facias then issued, and in execution of this writ the same undivided one-third interest of the said Mrs. Williams was *200seized and was advertised for sale. On the day of the sale a Mrs. Haynes, who was claiming to be owner of a one-half interest undivided in the 739…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Schenk v. EvoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Gratz v. Land & River Imp. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1897
- Grogan v. VacheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
- Sheafe v. WaitSupreme Court of Vermont · 1858
- Danneel v. KleinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1895
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hayne v. LissoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1917