State v. Navikaukas
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Dupont C. J.
The trial court, after a hearing pursuant to General Statutes § 53a-32,1 found the defendant in violation of three conditions of his probation, opened and vacated the original judgment of conviction, and rendered judgment imposing a sentence of two years.2 The defendant claims on appeal that the trial court erred (1) in revoking his probation without considering whether the violation constituted a substantial violation of probation, and (2) in failing to find the purposes of probation could no longer be served. We find no error.
The defendant pleaded guilty, on February 14,1984, to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Bearden v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- State v. RobersonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- DeLuca v. C. W. Blakeslee & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Kukanskis v. JasutSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. BaxterConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- Oak Leaf Marina, Inc. v. ErtelConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
- State v. MarchConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- State v. WrightConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
- State v. DeMasiConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.