Legal Opinion

Becher v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 3, 1905PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of the Bronx. First District. Action by Henry Becher against the city of New York. From a final order of the Municipal Court in favor of plaintiff in. a proceeding for the removal of the defendant for a forcible entry and detainer, defendant appeals. Reversed.

1Opinion of the CourtWillard Bartlett, J.

The plaintiff maintained a stand for the sale of refreshments in Pelham Bay Park, under a written agreement between him and the city of New York, whereby the city granted to him “the privilege of maintaining a stand at the bathhouses near Firman Mansion, for sale of refreshments (spirituous liquors excepted), and renting bathing suits, for the term of three years, from the twenty-fifth day of November, 1903.” On April 4, 1904, the commissioner of parks for the borough of the Bronx assumed to revoke the permit issued to the plaintiff, and notified him of the revocation. A similar notice of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wood v. . PhillipsNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  2. Gushee v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  3. Waterbury v. DeckelmannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  4. Deluise v. Long Island RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  5. Deluise v. Long Island RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lamken v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  2. In re MunroDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1912
  3. Ratino v. HartWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API