Legal Opinion

State v. Graham

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 21, 1995No. 9326SC1268PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Chief Judge.

Prior to defendant’s trial, the Property Control Bureau of the Charlotte Police Department destroyed the rape kit and all articles of clothing the victim had been wearing the night of the rape after a computer printout indicated that the case had been voluntarily dismissed. Neither party knew of its destruction until the second day of trial. Upon learning of it defendant moved to suppress testimony by the State’s experts in trace evidence and body fluids. He also moved for a mistrial. The trial court denied his motions.

Defendant contends on appeal that the trial court…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  5. State v. McDowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. ReavesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  2. State v. AlvarezCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  3. State v. BanksCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  4. State v. BlackwellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  5. State v. BlackwellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API