California Table Grape Commission v. Health Division
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.
In this proceeding under ORS 183.400, petitioners challenge the validity of a rule by which the Health Division of the Department of Human Resources (Division) regulates the sale of sulfite treated foods in restaurants.1 We hold the rule valid.
OAR 333-151-010(4) prohibits restaurants and certain other establishments from serving fresh fruits and vegetables to which sulfites have been added before delivery to the restaurant:
“Sulfur dioxide, sodium sulfite, sodium bisulfite, potassium, potassium bisulfite, sodium metabisulfite and potassium metabisulfite shall not be used in solution to dip,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lipscomb v. State Bd. of Higher Ed.Oregon Supreme Court · 1988
- California Table Grape Commission v. Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- California Table Grape Commission v. Health DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
3Cited by1 opinion
- California Table Grape Commission v. Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991