Legal Opinion

California Table Grape Commission v. Health Division

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 16, 1991No. CA A51216PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

In this proceeding under ORS 183.400, petitioners challenge the validity of a rule by which the Health Division of the Department of Human Resources (Division) regulates the sale of sulfite treated foods in restaurants.1 We hold the rule valid.

OAR 333-151-010(4) prohibits restaurants and certain other establishments from serving fresh fruits and vegetables to which sulfites have been added before delivery to the restaurant:

“Sulfur dioxide, sodium sulfite, sodium bisulfite, potassium, potassium bisulfite, sodium metabisulfite and potassium metabisulfite shall not be used in solution to dip,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lipscomb v. State Bd. of Higher Ed.Oregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. California Table Grape Commission v. Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  3. California Table Grape Commission v. Health DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. California Table Grape Commission v. Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API