Legal Opinion
Crawford v. Lamantia
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided September 14, 1994No. 93-2241PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STAHL, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant Peter Crawford filed a complaint charging defendants-appellees Paul Littlefield, Irving Plotkin and Harland Riker, Jr., individually and in their capacity as trustees of the Arthur D. Little, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan and Trust (“the Plan” or “the ESOP”), with a breach of their fiduciary duties as defined under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”). Plaintiff now appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants. After careful consideration of plaintiff's arguments, we affirm.
I
Factual and Procedural…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Jose MEDINA-MUNOZ, Etc., Et Al., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Carmen Nereida-Gonzalez v. Cirilo Tirado-DelgadoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Jimmie E. Woods v. Friction Materials, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Graden v. Conexant Systems Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Hansen v. Harper Excavating, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Fairneny v. Savogran Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
- Lewis v. City Of BostonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- Evans v. AkersCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.