State v. Pareo
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
KIEHNE, Judge.
*606 {1} In this case we are called on to decide whether Defendants had a statutory right to testify before the grand jury that indicted them, whether that right was violated, and if so, whether they had to demonstrate prejudice to have the indictments quashed. We hold that Defendants had a statutory right to testify before the grand jury, that their right to do so was violated, and that the failure to allow them to exercise that right was a structural error that required no showing of prejudice. We therefore affirm the district court's order quashing the indictments.
BACKGROUND
{2}…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. DavisNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. GuerraNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2012
- Allen v. LeMasterNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. GallegosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
- Jones v. MurdochNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.