Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bowers v. P. Wile's, Inc.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 28, 2016No. SJC 11923Published

1DissentCordy, J.

(dissenting, with whom Spina and Lenk, JJ., join). I disagree with what I believe is an overly broad expansion of the heretofore narrowly applicable mode of operation approach to premises liability. Because the defendant’s chosen method of operation — a “gravel area” located adjacent to an outdoor self-service portico1 — does not regularly invite third-party interference in any way previously recognized by this court as an exception to traditional premises liability, and because I agree with the court that the plaintiffs claim fails under the traditional approach, ante at 38, I respectfully…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mullins v. Pine Manor CollegeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  2. Oliveri v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  3. Pimentel v. Roundup CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Jasko v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1972
  5. Chiara v. Fry's Food Stores of Arizona, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API