Legal Opinion

FORD v. GARY

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided June 3, 2015No. 112,877PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LARRY JOPLIN, Judge.

¶ 1 Plaintiff/ Appellant Ross Ford (Plaintiff) seeks review of the trial court's order apportioning the proceeds of Plaintiffs settlement with Defendants/Appellees Peggy Gary and James P. Zink between Plaintiff and Interve-nors/Appellees City of Tulsa and Farmers Insurance Company. In this appeal, Plaintiff challenges the trial court's order as contrary to 36 O.S. § 3636, 85 O.S. § 44, and the precedential pronouncement of Prettyman v. Halliburton Co., 1992 OK 63, 841 P.2d 573.

T2 Plaintiff worked for Intervenor/Appel-lee City of Tulsa (City) as a motorcycle police officer.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

Glasco v. State ex rel. Oklahoma Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
Stump v. CheekSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
Prettyman v. Halliburton Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
ACCOSIF v. American States Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
Mustain v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

FORD v. GARYCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2015