Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Fulton v. Purse

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1935No. Docket No. 49, Calendar No. 38,370PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.

There is but a slight difference between the facts involved in this case, wherein a summary judgment was entered, and those presented in State of Ohio, ex rel. Fulton, v. James N. Purse, ante, 502. Two brothers, James N. Purse and Artie Purse, residents of the city of Detroit, owned certain real estate in the State of Ohio and negotiated a loan thereon from the Commerce Guardian Trust & Savings Bank in the city of Toledo. In an affidavit of James N. Purse, filed in opposition to the motion for summary judgment, he stated that when the note and mortgage were ready for execution the officers of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of LucasMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Palmer v. HillMichigan Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ohio Ex Rel. Superintendent of Banks v. EubankMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  2. House v. LefebvreMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  3. University of Chicago v. DaterMichigan Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API