State Ex Rel. Fulton v. Purse
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.
There is but a slight difference between the facts involved in this case, wherein a summary judgment was entered, and those presented in State of Ohio, ex rel. Fulton, v. James N. Purse, ante, 502. Two brothers, James N. Purse and Artie Purse, residents of the city of Detroit, owned certain real estate in the State of Ohio and negotiated a loan thereon from the Commerce Guardian Trust & Savings Bank in the city of Toledo. In an affidavit of James N. Purse, filed in opposition to the motion for summary judgment, he stated that when the note and mortgage were ready for execution the officers of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In Re Estate of LucasMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
- Palmer v. HillMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ohio Ex Rel. Superintendent of Banks v. EubankMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
- House v. LefebvreMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
- University of Chicago v. DaterMichigan Supreme Court · 1936