Legal Opinion

Figlar v. Figlar

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 3, 1978PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

These appeals arose from cross-actions in which each party first sought a divorce on the grounds of intolerable cruelty and subsequently amended the complaint to seek dissolution of the marriage on the ground that it had broken down irretrievably. A trial referee, sitting as a court, heard the cases simultaneously and concluded that the marriage had broken down irretrievably and that the husband (to whom we will refer as the defendant) was guilty of acts of intolerable cruelty which were the principal cause of the breakdown of the marriage. The court's decree awarded to the wife (to whom we…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Labella v. LabellaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
  2. Grinold v. GrinoldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
  3. DECOSSY v. DeCossySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
  4. Aguire v. AguireSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
  5. Spicer v. SpicerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Grayson v. GraysonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
  2. Jackson v. JacksonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1984
  3. Stewart v. StewartSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  4. Sunbury v. SunburyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
  5. Durkin v. DurkinConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API